The study used a desk review of available literature and key informant interviews to identify best practices and successes in the Danish Refugee Council and other organisations in terms of using data and evidence to inform and improve operational protection responses for people on the move in mixed migration flows. Evidence Aid’s definitions of the five stages within the humanitarian programme cycle were used to assess the application of MMC evidence within the programme cycle and to highlight any gaps. The study also sought to identify specific barriers to practitioners in particular applying MMC data and analysis in operational programme responses.
Evidence-based operational responses to mixed migration: challenges and best practice
The study used a desk review of available literature and key informant interviews to identify best practices and successes in the Danish Refugee Council and other organisations in terms of using data and evidence to inform and improve operational protection responses for people on the move in mixed migration flows. Evidence Aid’s definitions of the five stages within the humanitarian programme cycle were used to assess the application of MMC evidence within the programme cycle and to highlight any gaps. The study also sought to identify specific barriers to practitioners in particular applying MMC data and analysis in operational programme responses.
Share
| Author(s) | |
|---|---|
| Funded By | |
| Geographic Coverage | |
| Pages | |
| Publishing Organizations | |
| Theme | Political economy and discourse on displacement and solutions |
| Type of Study | |
| Year Published |
